Posted on October 11, 2013
Boyle Bringing It
Hockey season is upon us, and oh hey, the Rangers are off to a 1-3-0 start, losing the last two games in utter blow-out fashion, sending the totally level-minded fanbase into a frenzy, because of course. And really, I get it. Losing 9-2 and 6-0 in consecutive games is horrifying. And we need to fix stuff, and fast. Only four games in, there’s plenty of time to turn this around, but it has to start soon.
I’m over here, though, with another concern in mind. My favorite player, Brian Boyle, hasn’t been the flashiest player the last couple years, and after being very close to being traded last April, he’s on the last year of his contract this year. His position on the team isn’t at all secure—at the least they could just let him walk at the end of the season as a UFA, or maybe they trade him mid-year to try and get something back for him. Many fans are annoyed he wasn’t traded over the summer. Me, I want him in blue for as long as possible. Which means I want him to have a fantastic year.
And you know what? Even though the season is very young, he is off to a hell of a start. I was feeling it during the games, but I wanted some proof, so I ran some numbers comparing his first four games of every year he’s been a Ranger. Using the 14 categories the NYR site’s boxscore gives us for each game, I can see that in 10 of those categories, Boyle’s stats are above average.
A couple quick notes:
– The 64% faceoff stat in the 2009-2010 season is based on a 10-for-16 total; in the fourth game in 2013-2014, he was 16-21.
– The 2010-2011 season was his career year, a 20-goal season.
One thing I’d been noticing in these crazy games this season is that Boyle’s been getting a lot of shots, often good for at least #2 for the team on any night (in the Anaheim game, he tied for #1 with Richards and Callahan). As of this moment, he actually leads the team for the year with his 15 (though Nash has missed 1 and two-thirds games). The first instinct for anyone hearing this is to groan about the rest of the team not making shots—if Brian Boyle is your leading shooter, there must be a problem.
But looking at his past history, you can see that this year is a huge departure for his norm.
He had a really awful regular season last year. He admitted it, said he had to be better. What I’m seeing is that he’s taken it to heart, and he’s making it happen. He’s not scoring yet, but I think if he keeps putting up these kinds of numbers—and if his teammates can get their shit together to help him out—he’ll find the back of the net sooner rather than later. I’m saying he’ll have a goal before our home opener, and I would be very unsurprised if he had it in next week’s game in Washington.
So far, Boyle is one of our best players, and it’s not entirely due to the rest of the team being so discombobulated. He’s bringing it, he’s fighting for his place on this team. And I’m loving it. :D
Posted on September 7, 2013
DVDs, Blu-rays, and Combo Packs
A few weeks ago I finally took the plunge. I swapped out my trusty TV/VCR/DVD combo with a 19″ CRT TV for a 32″ LED flat-panel and a smart Blu-ray player. Future, here I am!
Mostly I’ve been enjoying the streaming options afforded to me by the Blu-ray—Netflix, MLB.TV, NHL GameCenter—and watching a DVD or two from my current collection. But I admit, I’ve been excited to buy my first Blu-ray movie and really break this puppy in.
I decided I’d go buy 42, which I actually saw twice in the theater and totally loved. (Katie, you like baseball movies? Shocker!) So I went to quick go make sure I could get it at one of the stores nearer to me and an idea for the price. But here’s the thing: It’s available in a DVD-only option, and a Blu-Ray/DVD/Download combo pack. And that’s it. No Blu-ray by itself.
How stupid is that?
The combo pack on its own is not stupid. Some people may have more than one viewing area and maybe one of them still just has a DVD player. Maybe someone is still on a DVD player but knows that soon they will be getting a Blu-ray, and this saves them money on upgrading the disc later. Maybe someone’s got friends who borrow their movies and then lose them; having the extra disc is a good help, there! And the download could be handy, too (I’m less annoyed by that part of it).
But I’m not any of those people. I have limited space and have just had to put all my TV series discs into binders just to make some room for my movies. What I definitely don’t need is an extra disc that I will probably never have a use for. So why are you forcing me to pay for this extra stuff just to get the newest technology?
My friend Alli tells me that before the combo packs came out, she remembers Blu-ray only versions being at the same price point as these packs now, so she feels like she’s getting a bonus for nothing. But I never paid attention to Blu-ray pricing before. All I know is that the price jumps from about $20 for a DVD to $30 for the combo, and 2 of those things in the combo I don’t need!
So why not have the DVD for $20, the Blu-ray for $30, and the combo for, say, $35? That’s still a huge deal for someone who would have a use for both disc types, but as someone who doesn’t need both, I can see that I’m not paying for something I don’t need, that the Blu-ray is just more expensive because of the technology behind it. Right now, though, I feel like I’m getting ripped off. I’m more likely to just buy the DVD and be annoyed that I got this new tech that I can’t even really use to its full potential—and right now, I’m actually MORE likely to stop at Redbox and pay less than $2 to watch it today. In fact… *type type type* Okay, it’s reserved for me. BOOM. Plus I got another movie, so DOUBLE-BOOM.
I’m sure, eventually, I’ll get used to this. Especially as I see new movies that are Blu-ray only at the same price as the combo packs. But for now, for today? REALLY. FRICKIN’. STUPID.